TPile

LOS ANGELES — The woman accused of making unauthorized use of MySpace to  inflict emotional harm on a 13-year-old girl, who then committed suicide, "fully intended to hurt and prey on Megan Meier’s psyche," a prosecutor charged Wednesday, as opening statements began in the first federal cyber-bullying trial.

After some initial problems finding unbiased jurors, a jury of six men and six women was finally impanelled in the trial Wednesday afternoon. Prosecutor Thomas O’Brien immediately launched into his opening argument, in which he previewed the case he plans to present in the days ahead.

Defendant Lori Drew, a 49-year-old Missouri woman, watched O’Brien’s opening salvo wide-eyed from the defense table, until O’Brien reached the details of Meier’s suicide and its aftermath. Then Drew began scribbling intently on a notepad, averting her eyes from the prosecutor and jury.

O’Brien claimed that Drew actively conspired with two others in creating and maintaining a MySpace profile for a nonexistent 16-year-old boy named "Josh Evans" in September 2006. The Evans account was used by multiple people to flirt with, befriend and ultimately reject 13-year-old Megan Meier, who’d had a falling-out with Drew’s daughter.

One of the users of the account, Ashley Grills, a then-18-year-old woman employed by Drew and her husband, has admitted to sending a final, cruel message to Meier while posing as Evans: "The world would be a better place without you. Have a shitty rest of your life." Meier then hanged herself in her bedroom.

Grills has been granted immunity from prosecution in exchange for her cooperation with the government, and is scheduled to testify against Drew.

Though the prosecution concedes that Drew did not send that final message, O’Brien argued that the whole purpose of the hoax from the start was to inflict emotional distress on a vulnerable young girl.

O’Brien said he’d offer testimony that Drew conspired with her daughter, Sarah, and with Grills to humiliate Meier, and was heard laughing about the hoax they were perpetrating on the girl.

Drew discussed using Meier’s personal notes to "Evans" to humiliate her at school, and  conspired at one point to lure the girl to a nearby mall to meet Evans, whereupon Meier would similarly be confronted with the messages she’d sent the nonexistent boy, said O’Brien.

After Meier’s death, Drew’s hairdresser allegedly asked Drew why she was going to the wake, given her role in the cyber bullying. Drew’s response, O’Brien said, was, "It’s not like I pulled the trigger."

At that point in the opening argument, one of the jury alternates, an elderly woman, visibly cringed.

Defense attorney H. Dean Steward, delivering his opening remarks, painted a very different picture. He claimed that Drew knew about the plan to create the hoax MySpace profile and manipulate Meier, but neither encouraged nor participated in it.

Steward told the jury that forensics evidence will prove the account was not created from Drew’s computer, and that no messages were sent by Drew.

Top image: Sept. 4, 2008 file photo shows Lori Drew leaving court in Los Angeles. Nick Ut/AP

See Also:

• Defense Says Jury Pool Filled with ‘Viciousness’ Towards Lori Drew
• Jury Selection Begins in MySpace Suicide Trial
• Former Justice Dept. Prosecutor Joins Defense in MySpace Suicide Case
• Lori Drew Files Motions to Dismiss in MySpace Cyberbullying Case
• Experts Say MySpace Suicide Indictment Sets ‘Scary’ Legal Precedent
• Lori Drew Indicted in MySpace Suicide Case
• Indictment Expected This Morning in Megan Meier Cyberbullying Case — Updated
• Teen Involved in MySpace Suicide Hoax Says Adult Also Participated
• No Charges Will Be Filed in Cyberbullying Case
• Federal Grand Jury Issues Subpoenas in Teen Cyberbullying Case
• Prosecutor Will Review Megan Meier Cyberbullying Case
• Megan Meier Suicide Stokes the Internet Fury Machine
• Blog Readers Out Anonymous Adults that Newspaper Refused to Identify

These are tough times for web journalism, which is why we admire the innovative "webathon" approach announced today by the National Review Online. Explains NRO editor Kathryn Jean Lopez: "Donations of $1,000 or more include new opportunities for access to our editors and writers."

I’m here to announce that at Threat Level, we’re going much cheaper. Here’s the skinny on our new sponsorship drive, broken down by your level of support.

Stay tuned for payment details.

A federal judge shut down the websites of a company selling do-it-yourself spyware known as RemoteSpy, following a complaint filed by federal regulators accusing the company of violating federal fair trade law, the Federal Trade Commission announced Wednesday.

The temporary restraining order and lawsuit (.pdf) mark the first time the FTC has targeted the amateur spyware market, where stalkers, jealous spouses and ethically challenged private investigators can buy keylogging software that secretly monitors people’s every online move.

RemoteSpy runs as a hidden Windows program on the target’s computer, recording password, website visits and screenshots and secretly uploading them to RemoteSpy.com, where the purchaser can log-in to see the results. The company described the product as “perfect for those who wish to monitor their computer while they are away,” but also touted that it can be remotely installed, according to a cached copy of the CyberSpy Software’s website.

The Federal Trade Commission alleges that the company provided instructions on how to fool people into installing the spyware by adding it as an innocuous-loking email attachment, including embedding it in a Word document. The complaint asks a Florida federal district court judge to stop CyberSpy and its CEO Tracer Spence from selling the software, saying it is “likely to cause substantial injury to consumers that cannot be reasonably avoided and is not outweighed by countervailing benefits to consumers or corporations.”

Much will likely turn on how much the company marketed its product for uses by stalkers, corporate criminals and jealous spouses, where the victim wouldn’t know they were being monitored. In comparison, businesses are largely free to monitor their employees’ web surfing and email usage.

The FTC took action after the Electronic Privacy Information Center filed a complaint (.pdf) about the company in March. That complaint also mentioned other companies that sell similar products, but it’s not known if the FTC is also planning enforcement actions against Spy-guide.net, Covert-Spy.com, RemotePCSpy.com and Awareness Technologies.

Attempts to reach CyberSpy CEO Tracer Spence were not immediately successful.

See Also:

• FBI’s Sought Approval for Custom Spyware in FISA Court
• Fed Blotter: New Charges Filed Against Alleged Cyber Peeping Tom …
• FBI Spyware: How Does the CIPAV Work? — UPDATE
• U.S. House Passes Anti-Spyware Bill
• In Message to Industry, Government Fines Adware Purveyor $3 …
• Hacker Sentenced to 2 Years for MySpace Cyberstalking

LOS ANGELES — More than a dozen witnesses are scheduled to testify in the trial of a woman accused of making unauthorized use of MySpace to cause emotional distress to a 13-year-old girl, who then committed suicide.

Prosecution witnesses in the trial of 49-year-old Lori Drew of O’Fallon, Missouri, include:

• Ron and Tina Meier, Drew’s former neighbors and the parents of Megan Meier, who committed suicide

• Ashley Grills, a former employee of Drew’s who helped set up the phony MySpace account that was used to harass Meier. Grills has pointed the finger at Drew as the mastermind of the hoax

• Jessica Mulford, believed to be a neighborhood teen who sent one of the messages to Meier through the MySpace account

• Michele Mulford, Jessica’s mother, who told authorities that Drew called her daughter after learning of Megan Meier’s suicide and told her to "keep her mouth shut" about their activity and to stay off of MySpace.

The list, which Judge Wu read to prospective jurors Tuesday, includes more than half a dozen other witnesses. Presumed to be among them are Drew’s hairdresser, to whom she reportedly discussed the hoax as it was occurring, and a deputy sheriff who spoke with Drew after Meier’s suicide. The latter is expected to testify that Drew admitted to starting the MySpace account, among other things.

It may be Thursday before the first witnesses are called. The trial is expected to last five days, but has already experienced at least a half a day of delay after questionnaires filled out by prospective jurors  Tuesday revealed strong biases against the defendant.

In response, U.S. District Judge George Wu gave the defense an
additional hour to review the juror responses and called in
a second pool of 30 more prospective jurors to fill out the questionnaire, adding to the initial 75.

Wu ruled last week that the jury could hear evidence of Meier’s
suicide in considering Drew’s guilt or innocence, saying it was
unlikely that jurors would not have already heard about the case, which
made national headlines late last year.

But as the judge questioned the jury pool Tuesday, it became clear
that some of them weren’t familiar with the case prior to stepping into
the Los Angeles federal courtroom this week. When asked to describe
what they’d heard about the case, their responses indicated only
information that had been read to them from the indictment that morning.

Others, however, showed strong biases in answering the written
questionnaire, which included this question: "You will hear evidence
in the case about the suicide of a 13-year-old girl. Can you put aside
any sympathy, pity or sadness you may feel as a result of this
evidence, and fairly and objectively evaluate it, along with the other
evidence in this case?"

Several of the jurors admitted on the form that they could not put
aside feelings of sympathy and indicated they might have a strong bias
against the defendant. But when Judge Wu asked them to elaborate, they
reversed themselves and said they felt they could be impartial.

Judge Wu’s questioning of the jury pool highlighted the challenge of
finding a neutral jury in a case that touches so many emotional and
cultural nerves.

One woman indicated a bias based on personal history. Her daughter’s
best friend had committed suicide and her husband’s nephew was accused
of harassing someone through MySpace. She said, however, that she
thought she could approach Drew’s case objectively.

Another woman told Wu, "I heard so many bad things about the internet
and MySpace … I see in the news all the time how dangerous it is."

A young male prospective juror said a female friend had been the victim
of cyberbullying in high school. He also said he worked with youth
groups through his church and had strong feelings about how people use
the internet maliciously, and about people who abuse children. His
answers seemed to betray a desire to stay off the jury. But then he, too,
said he felt he could be impartial.

Wu repeatedly reminded the jurors throughout Tuesday that Drew was
not being charged with causing Meier’s suicide but with violating the
Computer Fraud and Abuse Act by breaking MySpace’s terms of service.

Drew is accused of conspiring with two others in creating and
maintaining a MySpace profile for a nonexistent 16-year-old boy named
"Josh Evans" in September 2006. The Evans account was used to flirt
with and befriend 13-year-old Megan Meier, who’d had a falling-out with
Drew’s daughter. "Evans" ultimately turned on Meier, and told the girl
that the world would be a better place without her. Meier then hanged
herself in her bedroom. Drew is charged with unauthorized computer access for
allegedly violating MySpace’s terms of service with the intent of
inflicting emotional distress.

The case against Drew hinges on a novel interpretation of the federal
Computer Fraud and Abuse Act — commonly known as an anti-hacking statute. MySpace’s user agreement requires
registrants, among other things, to provide factual information about
themselves; to refrain from soliciting personal information from
minors; and forbids members from using information obtained from
MySpace services to harass or harm other people. By allegedly violating
that click-to-agree contract, Drew committed the same crime as any
hacker who obtains unauthorized access to a computer, prosecutors maintain.

To make that charge stick, prosecutors must convince jurors that Drew’s alleged terms-of-service violation was done primarily for the purpose of committing a tortious act. In this case, the
prosecutors say the tortious act was Drew’s alleged intentional infliction of
emotional distress, which makes Megan Meier’s suicide relevant in
reaching a verdict, they argue.

The use of the anti-hacking law to charge Drew was criticized by
experts, who said it set a dangerous precedent that could potentially
make a felon out of anyone who violated the terms of service of any
website — a prospect that is particularly troubling, they said, because
terms-of-service agreements sometimes contain onerous provisions, are
often arbitrarily and unilaterally changed by companies, and are rarely
read by users.

The trial is expected to hinge on whether Drew was aware that she was
breaking the MySpace terms of service in setting up the fake account,
and whether Drew intended to cause emotional distress to Meier.

Image: Lori Drew walks to federal court in Los Angeles on Tuesday. Ric Francis/AP

See Also:

• Defense Says Jury Pool Filled with ‘Viciousness’ Towards Lori Drew
• Jury Selection Begins in MySpace Suicide Trial
• Former Justice Dept. Prosecutor Joins Defense in MySpace Suicide Case
• Lori Drew Files Motions to Dismiss in MySpace Cyberbullying Case
• Experts Say MySpace Suicide Indictment Sets ‘Scary’ Legal Precedent
• Lori Drew Indicted in MySpace Suicide Case
• Indictment Expected This Morning in Megan Meier Cyberbullying Case — Updated
• Teen Involved in MySpace Suicide Hoax Says Adult Also Participated
• No Charges Will Be Filed in Cyberbullying Case
• Federal Grand Jury Issues Subpoenas in Teen Cyberbullying Case
• Prosecutor Will Review Megan Meier Cyberbullying Case
• Megan Meier Suicide Stokes the Internet Fury Machine
• Blog Readers Out Anonymous Adults that Newspaper Refused to Identify